ESSENTIALS
- Needle
- Strong tape
- Super glue
- 1 or two buttons
- Strong thread
- Sleep mat patch
- Medical tape
- Band-Aids
- Anti-bacterial ointment
- Anti-diarrheal pills
- Pain killers
- Extra electrolytes
ESSENTIALS
The Strength and Conditioning world has been meeting a lot of resistance from self-proclaimed tough guys lately. Here's the argument: "I can't squat or bench, but I can sure sling bricks and lumber around with the boys. That's all I need."
While there is a great deal of ignorance in this statement, it seems to be a mantra that is regurgitated by many. My first question is, why would any man be against getting stronger? Do they not realize that, especially if they have an active job, getting stronger would just make their job a lot easier? Does a 10-brick Tong not feel lighter if you are stronger? Does climbing a ladder on the job site all day not feel easier if your squat numbers are up? If you are moving furniture all day, who do you think will perform better, with more ease: the guy who never lifts, or the guy who has a decent deadlift? One more: when you have to move 65 wheelbarrows of concrete that day, which person do you think will have an easier time: the bigger, stronger guy, who has big squat and deadlift numbers? Or, the skinny guy who is only "worker strong?" How simple logic goes over the heads of so many is simply beyond us in this field.
I believe these anti-strength arguments come from two places:
1. The 1970s myth of "if you lift weights, you'll become big and bulky."
2. Instead of admitting that they are embarrassingly weak, most of these men would rather hide behind these cult-like statements because it sounds cooler than going to the gym and putting in actual work.
The first argument is easily destroyed after anyone attempts to get big and bulky for a few months, or even a few years. As it turns out, even the most genetically gifted, drug-using pro bodybuilders must still put in decades of work. For many, they will spend 10+ years working hard, doing all the drugs, but are still never big enough to even step on stage. Despite what your aerobics-loving mom told you, just lifting a few weights does not make you big and bulky. In fact, if anyone could benefit from getting stronger, it would be both you and your mom.
The second argument seems to stem from whatever is trendy online. A decade ago, Crossfit helped demonize actual strength training and got most people on board with performing highly technical lifts, to failure. It seemed cool because it was different, the "athletes" (who are also on drugs) looked normal. It also mocked anyone who performed basic strength training. You know the type: the average guy who performs the compound lifts year-round, eats right, and actually has the physique you have been pursuing for years. Yea, screw that guy; he doesn't know anything. Another version of this "farmer strong" argument comes from the rough and tough workers, or at least the men who think they are rough and tough. Then the younger kids get ahold of that, and it goes on and on...
I could simply point out the logical error that if working on a farm or construction site made you jacked, we'd only see jacked tradesmen, and there would be no fat farmers or ranchers. We could also point to the actually jacked workers, who do train for strength, and mention their physique and job performance. You know that jacked pipe fitter on your crew? The guy y'all pick on for bringing eggs and protein to work? Yea, he's in much better shape than all of you. But why? Notice, after your 12 hour shift, you are crushed and only have the energy to hit the drive through and then your couch, in front of the TV. What about the jacked guy on your crew, the one you pick on for not joining in on poker night? He's drinking his pre-workout while walking to his truck, then he heads to the gym. Not only does the work day not crush him like it does you and your buddies, but he even has the energy to go train afterward. Is he crazy? Is he on drugs? Did the job make him this strong and energetic? Or, did him putting up some standard man numbers in the gym make him this way?
Don't get me wrong; a man who has an active job is much better off than someone with an office job. The problem is the ignorance that the active job makes someone strong. So, let's break it down in knuckle-dragger terms:
"Strength:" Overall force production. It is measured by force generated against the environment, or an object, i.e. - a barbell. How do we measure strength? Easy: we measure the weight on the bar.
Now, some might argue the following: "I load 100, 75 lb bails of hay everyday. Let's see your average bodybuilder do that." A strong argument, but does it hold any weight? Of course, if you start that job completely fresh, moving such weights all day will absolutely break you off. You will be sore for a few days; maybe even a few weeks. However, after a while, your body adapts, and this job, that was once training, now has simply become an activity. Unless you add an extra pound or two to each bail of hay each week, you will never get stronger doing this work. Of course, you are stronger than the average male who does nothing. You might even see the bodybuilder, the fake argument you have created, struggle in this environment. However, what you fail to recognize is that, once the bodybuilder adapts to this type of work, he will actually become better at it than you. As long as his strength numbers in the gym continue to improve, and he continues bailing hay, he will continue to out-perform you. Why? Because he is stronger!
I could offer 100s of examples as above, but we don't have all day. The bottom line is that being stronger improves literally every aspect of one's life: performing at work, performing in the field, and performing in daily life. We all have to sit down and get back up eventually, right? We all carry groceries and load our trucks with equipment. We're not telling you to become obese and only care about a 600 lb deadlift. For some reason, that's what everyone jumps to: the mythical, obese power lifter. Here's a simple test for all of you. First, turn off the TV and stop watching other people live. Second, spend two months simply performing the compound lifts, progressively getting stronger in each. Then, observe how you feel doing literally anything afterward. As long as you train for strength and train properly, you should notice a drastic increase in performance, both on the job and in your personal life. Afterall, we do want to be strong, manly men, right?
Give strength a chance
Carry on
BACKGROUND
Strength, as measured by total force production (weight moved), is the foundation of all human activity. Without doing any other form of training, improving one's strength leads to an exceptional improvement in everything we do. This is especially true for men in a combat role. Carrying a 40-50 lb. kit, over varying terrain, for hours or days, is extremely demanding on the body. Patrolling in kit, as an example, is however a sub-maximal load. That means if an individual becomes stronger over time, all sub-maximal loads become even more so, meaning that those activities become easier to perform. By training for strength, we improve our efficiency in every activity we conduct. Also, an often over-looked benefit to improving one's strength is overall resilience: to the weather and variations, against sickness, as well as during times of extreme mental stress. This is why men must be strong, and we must test their strength. Be advised, however, that these numbers are minimum standards, and individuals should always strive to exceed them. Why squats, deadlift, and bench press? Why not the kettlebell or bodyweight exercises that the "functional fitness" gurus promote? The answer is fairly simple:
Cardio-vascular endurance, or "cardio," is also a critical during combat operations. Combined with strength, an individual with excellent endurance performs better in the field. Despite how Hollywood and video games portray combat operations, we should view this activity as a sport that's similar to baseball: a very long, mostly aerobic event, with inter-dispersed, short bursts of aerobic performance. One must be able to "go the distance," as well as perform an action, such as a 3-5 second rush or flanking maneuver, very quickly. Units must also be able to perform these actions repeatedly, over a long period of time.
References & Background
This is a large collaboration with input from many different groups:
Infantry Small Unit Mountain Operations
US Army Battle Focused Training (FM 7-1)
Physiology of Sport & Exercise, Kenney
This is straight from the Joint Publication (JP) 3-31, Joint Land Operations:
"The Army SOP is designed to standardize the way units operate, ensuring that tasks are performed consistently and efficiently. It is a critical component of the Army’s operational planning and execution process, as it provides a clear understanding of the procedures and protocols that must be followed in various situations."
SOPs can be at any level, for any group, or any specific task. An SOP can also be different between different units for accomplishing the same task. Basically, imagine if you are 60 years old, and are writing a book about kicking ass in life. At some point you have figured out a few tasks that can be solved by using a simple problem solving approach. Your SOP might include planning stages, equipment requirements, what you are doing while out performing the job or activity, and maybe even a follow-up at the end. Your SOP might simply include basic procedures on how to navigate from point to another in your vehicle. Then, you'll make a separate SOP on that same trip but while on foot. Pretty simple, right? So what is the point of an SOP?
While we may think everything we know and do are just "common sense," it may not be common sense to everyone you are leading or working with. But, the fact remains, you know the correct or most efficient way to accomplish a task, and you need your team to be able to do it your way. So what if you are sick or injured, or just not around? Can you trust your team to perform the task, by your standards, without you being there? Most likely not. You can, however, enable them to pull out the SOP for said task, and follow those instructions. As leaders, we cannot expect our team to know everything that we know, or to perform everything exactly like we can. However, we can teach them as much as possible and then, when you are not around and they become ignorant, the SOP will become their default. Lastly, SOPs can be used as assisting people through basic tasks during times of extreme stress. This is where unit training and battle drills come in to play.
We build our tactics and battle drill SOPs by evaluating our unit capabilities, combined with analyzing the operational considerations of our environment (METT-TC). What is our job, and what are we capable of accomplishing? So first, we develop our SOPs. Next, we must test those SOPs. This is where training and sometimes, real-world testing comes into play. Hopefully we are testing our SOPs in training before the real-world does it for us, because that can suck.
In summary, we should establish SOPs for basic tasks that we can expect our team to be able to accomplish. Can we conduct a reconnaissance patrol? If so, how do we actually do it? It could come down to a simple word document with task, conditions, and standards, or just a word doc with a step by step instruction. Many unit SOPs for radio communications and first aid applications will be step by step. However, when we are talking about battlefield tactics, the SOP will become lengthier and more complicated. The bottom line is that we have to build the SOPs in the first place, and then test them to improve them.
A few examples of necessary SOPs:
1. TOC setup, organization, and duties
2. Small Unit Tactics: Patrolling, OPs, Reconnaissance, Battle Drills, etc
3. Unit training and planning
4. Communications and Radio Etiquette
5. Team structure and equipment (MTOE)
Here's the crazy secret: every diet works for nearly everyone, always
Why? Why does everyone seem to have the magical secret, or "super food" that, not only allows them to easily burn through fat, but that diet also cures all their ailments? Also, there seems to be extreme polarization between dieters: Keto, Carnivore, Vegan, High-Carb, Low-Carb, Intermittent Fasting, Raw....If you look closely, all groups have multiple "science-based" claims and personal stories proving that they hold the secret to fat loss and godliness. The answer actually simple:
All these people, for the first time in their lives, have finally started to train or exercise, and are also paying attention to what goes into their mouths. That's all it is. These people went from being extremely inactive and eating everything, to moving around like a human, and simply trying to eat less. They don't understand that because of this, literally anything and everything they do will work....for a while.
NEWBIE GAINS: If you are a beginner, you can do literally any exercise program, and follow literally any diet, and it will 100% work.......for about 4-6 months.
So, how does one rule out all the misinformation and straight up lies, keep things simple, and just get in shape and lose their fat? That's the point: keep it simple. The calories in, calories out formula is hated because it is deemed as "too simple." Many women prefer to reverse the formula, and simply starve themselves. All the while, they are all spending more time "researching" and being neurotic about things that don't actually matter, instead of just putting in the basic work. As Mark Rippetoe (Starting Strength) has stated numerous times, "stupid people love complexity." Instead of admitting that they actually don't follow the basics, people always revert back to their victimhood. What if we just expended more calories than we consumed? What if we focused on protein and, for the rest of our macros, we just ensured that they come from actual FOOD? What if we stayed active and trained properly? Sounds too easy, and it is. And, as far as training goes, people disagree on the forms as well. Of course, there has to be a hidden boogeyman involved there as well.
The most barebones, simplified method for getting fit is below. Caution: this advice is not complicated; there is no hidden bad guy; it works for 99% of humans; it is agreed upon by all actual experts: Physiologists, Nutritionists, and coaches and trainers.
1. Expend more calories - not starve yourself because you never move
2. Train for Strength (lower reps, heavier weights), minimum 2x per muscle group, per week. Everyone, at all ages, and both sexes should being trying to get strong
3. Get in your daily activity: anywhere from 8-12k steps per day. That is much easier and more efficient than sitting all day and then running a marathon once per week, or conducting brutal HIIT workouts to compensate. Act like a human: MOVE!
4. Prioritize protein:
Consume minimum 2 grams of protein per pound of body weight*
*Most older people require more due to lowered absorption efficiency
5. For carbs and fats, just make sure they come from actual food (you know what "food" is, and you know it is not Taco Bell). Do any ratio you like and what feels better for you: low fat, low carbs, who cares? Just don't demonize any specific macro or source.
*note: if you are strength training or are a serious athlete, a higher carb diet has been proven to be best for performance
6. BE CONSISTENT. Consistency has been proven time and time and again to be the most critical factor in driving long-term results. Remember the "newbie gains" fact? The great majority usually fall off the wagon within that 4-6 month window. Do your best to NOT be that guy
7. Don't have an "all or nothing attitude." Just because you miss a few workouts, that doesn't kill your entire plan. Remember that you're human, and things happen. If you usually train 3x per week but can only make one, that's fine. Get back to it as soon as possible
Carry on!
Randall, Grunt Proof
OAKOC
If you've watched the recent videos on tactics, you've probably seen this acronym pop up a few times. What hell is it, and why is it so important? Let's dig in! Land navigation is simply getting to one point from another. Tactical navigation, something we practice every time we step out of friendly territory, for any reason, brings in a whole other level of considerations. Now you have to think about bad guys, ambushes and dying. Dying is not good. So what considerations should we have when planning our routes and rally points? Where do we set up our Objective Rally Point (ORP)? Do we use roads? Is it all just METTT-TC? What about Observations Posts (OP)? How do we build one, and what considerations do we have when setting in a defensive position?
ENTER OAKOC:
Observation
Avenues of Approach
Key & Decisive Terrain
Obstacles
Cover & Concealment
When planning for almost anything, this simple decision making aid can save you lots of headache and even death. Seriously, us Grunts use it for everything we do in the field. So, what does it all mean, and how can we use it? Let's take the OP and mission scenario:
MISSION
You are a 9-man squad and must conduct a tactical movement to MB 1234 5678, establish an OP, observe vicinity MB 666 555 and report all activity to higher. We're going to follow the Troop Leading Procedures to get our guys moving, and start planning the mission. We need to know which routes to take and where to establish our OP. This is where OAKOC comes in. We'll make decisions based on our map reconnaissance.
Become a channel member to start learning! SIGN UP HERE
Crossfit, and all of its copycats have sold you on the idea that you have to complete multiple "movements," at high intensity to trick your body and be prepared for the combat world. Even worse, the average Box sees complete beginners being forced to perform highly technical Olympic lifts with too much weight. It's all marketing, and it works. Doesn't it look cool to see an extremely fit dude performing creative and fun workouts? Doesn't it seem like those exercises match the challenges of combat? Afterall, we do have to jog and sprint every now and then in the combat world. We do need endurance to survive the long days full of miles, while wearing gear. The military practices this by simply running, in shorts and tennis shoes. But is running in shorts and tennis shoes really the best way to condition yourself for those challenges?
The answer is quite simple: NO. I can't tell you the last time I had to run 2-3 miles in PT clothes in combat. In fact, that never happened. For context, I was a Grunt during the Battle of Ramadi (05-06). In one of the most brutal fights of the entire Global War on Terror, our deployment was combat-intensive. Every time we went out, something happened, and usually many things happened. Then, we spent about 11 days storming the city to begin building the first Combat Outposts. It was non stop, street to street, house to house fighting. Despite all the low-intensity cardio demands, I did not run for miles in shorts and running shoes. So why do we train "endurance" that way in the military context? Is it the lack of understanding the demands we are facing? Is it simply institutional-inbreeding?
So how should we train for combat endurance? We have to begin by defining endurance or conditioning. Endurance is simply your ability to perform a lower intensity movement for an extended period of time. Simple. How do we measure endurance? The most reliable method is by using Heart Rate Zones, combined with your age. There are five zones: 1-3 are your aerobic zones and 4 and 5 are your high intensity, shorter duration zones. Zone 1 would be more along the lines of just casually strolling around, while zone 3 would be the upper limit that you can perform for an extended period. For me, zones 1-3 are around 90 to 153 bpm. That is my endurance training zone. Now, what can we do to work in that heart rate zone, that will also mimic what I would do on a mission. Well, if you've listened to me for a while, you are already doing it: you should be rucking. In addition, actually patrolling with your gear a few times per month is also more realistic than jogging in shorts. In addition, your daily activity (10-12000 steps per day) will also cover a lot of your zones 1-2.
"Dude, there is no way just walking, rucking, and patrolling can replace running for my endurance." Why not? You're training in zones 1-3, right? Even better, you are wearing most of the gear you will actually operate in. Again, are you patrolling and fighting in tennis shoes and shorts? Are you wearing light clothing and jogging for 2 miles on a mission? No? Then why are you "training" for endurance that way? How does that training modality match the effect you want to achieve? It just doesn't make sense. "Well we do have to actually run every now and then in combat." Absolutely; but, again, you're not doing that in shorts and tennis shoes - you are maneuvering in your boots and combat gear. In addition, the most you will be running in combat will be possibly for 1/4 to 1/2 a mile. That is about it. You may have to perform a few sprints at a short distance; this could include your "3-5 second rushes." So what about sprint training? Fair enough. However, are you arguing that a big, strong guy with a 400 lbs deadlift, who rucks and patrols in his gear every week, cannot perform a sprint? If you believe that, you may want to revisit where sprint "power" or just power in general comes from. How do we train power? By getting stronger. A strong man who also patrols and rucks often will have no problem sprinting. He will definitely have no problems with a bit of light jogging in his gear. Even better, the big strong (not big fat) will have a much easier time in those conditions than a skinny, weak guy, who does none of the recommended training.
Now, let's put it all together. Do you still think running in shorts and tennis shoes for miles is the most effective way to train for combat endurance? It will work, sure. But does it resemble what you will most likely be doing on patrols and missions? No. So, if you just enjoy running and, in addition to the strength training, patrolling, and rucking in your gear, you still have the time to go run, then do it. Go run. Some people just need to run. For the rest of us and especially for those who are short on time, combining strength, patrolling, and rucking should be the go-to method for combat fitness.
SOURCES
Exercise Physiology: Human Bioenergetics and Its Applications
Tortora & Derrickson's "Introduction to the Human Body..." 9th edition (http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Human-Body-Gerard-Tortora/dp/1118129199)
Mark Rippetoe's Starting Strength
Alright, so I've made many posts about fitness, strength, and nutrition, and I've heard all your questions. Many are still confused; they don't want to read long-winded essays; they just want to be told what to do. So here ya go: a step by step training and nutrition guide. If you do long for the detailed explanations, follow the Combat Fitness playlist
A good Soldier must be strong, able to carry loads, and be aerobically fit. We can cover all those components with a simple program:
1. 2-3x per week strength training
2. 1x per week rucking
3. Daily activity: minimum 10k steps, sports, etc.
4. Eat for fuel - not for beauty pageants
THE WORKOUT
Monday: Full Body Strength, Starting Strength Novice Linear Progression*
3-5 Warm-up sets | 3 working sets of 5 reps | Add 5 lbs every workout
1. Squats
2. Bench (Replace bench with overhead press 1x per week)
3. Deadlift 1x5
*Extremely deconditioned or older people may benefit from 2x per week
*Once per week perform a few sets of chin-ups at the end
WARRIOR-SPECIFIC CONDITIONING
Ruck at least once per week
1. Determine How Much You Should Eat Find one of the many FREE Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) calculators online and figure out what you should eat every day. But don't get too wrapped around the numbers game. Afterall, many people underestimate how much they eat and over-estimate how much they train. But we do need a baseline for what you SHOULD be eating daily. After a few weeks you can adjust those numbers based on your habits and activity. Now what about those macros?
Men: Consume 1 gram of protein per lean pound of body weight; 20-30% of your calories are from fat; the remaining calories are from carbs. If you are trying to cut extra body fat, simply cut the dietary fat slightly. This should place you into a slight deficit, while still fueling your workouts with the carbohydrates. That's right, cutting carbs first is actually the wrong way. Well, that is, if you want to continue training and not lose all your strength. Older men may need to consume more than 1g/lb of bodyweight. As we age, our digestion and efficiency becomes degraded. It's pretty hard to over-do protein intake.
For the hard-gainers: the absolute best way to pack on bodyweight is Mark Rippetoe's "Gallon of Milk a Day." Milk is the cheapest and most efficient method of smashing in extra calories. Don't worry about your abs - you need to start looking like a grown man first.
Women: Consume .8 grams of protein per pound of lean body weight; maximum 25% calories from fat; the remaining calories are from carbs. Same as men, if you are trying to cut or get leaner, you can cut a bit of the fats but do not go crazy and starve yourself.
2. Eat the RIGHT foods. Believe it or not, most people know what food is good or not. It's built into us. Do I really need to tell you that potato chips and cupcakes are bad? Do I really need to tell you to drink water, instead of soda all day? Thought so...you know what to do; just do it.
Seek out nutrient dense foods and avoid calorie dense foods. It's that simple.
3. Eat for YOUR Fitness Level & Activity
Once you have established your BMR, you can then adjust your macros accordingly. If you are having a heavy day, add 150-300 extra calories. Try to eat a large breakfast to give you plenty of fuel until your next meal. If you cannot eat breakfast, try to eat a large dinner the night before. There are zero legitimate studies showing that large dinners promote unhealthy weight gain. On that note, there are zero legitimate studies showing that "intermittent fasting" leads to long-term healthy weight management. These are just little tricks influencers will push on you. Stick with the basics and you will be fine.
If you find that you are starving by dinner time or late at night, that is a good indicator that you did not eat enough during the day. Make a plan to eat more, earlier, the next day, and that should help. You shouldn't walk around feeling full all the time, but you also should not have endless cravings, with low energy.
4. Stop Demonizing Carbs!
Seriously, this nonsense has to stop. Carbs are not your problem - over-consuming them, in junk-food form is your problem. Carbs are fuel.
Carbohydrates are our primary source of energy. Glucose is the ready source, while your muscles and liver store them as glycogen. Glycogen is easily used by the body during activity. Forget about the gurus and pseudoscience for a minute. Your body wants to utilize carbs so much that when you cut off the supply it will make them from other sources, known as gluconeogenesis. Sure, you can force your body into Ketosis, where it must utilize other nutrients as glucose, but why would you make your body go through all the extra work? All this low-carb, keto crap is just that: crap. Notice that your friends who praise it always seem to get off it at some point. They also become extremely weak and lethargic during their cuts. The only way professional bodybuilders and fitness models are able to continue training, or even functioning, at such a low bodyfat percentage is because of the heavy drug usage.
5. Know What Training is, and Actually Train
People tend to confuse activity or "exercising" with actual training. "Training" is a specific activity designed to induce an exact effect. Example: strength and power training, a 5k running program. Going for an unloaded, leisurely walk is activity, or exercise. Training makes you grow, get faster, while demanding a ton of energy. Activity, while extremely beneficial for overall health and longevity, will not induce specific results, and do not require a lot of energy. Examples of training, with links to videos:
You should TRAIN for at least 3 days per week as a beginner, and around 5 times per week as an athlete. You should conduct basic activities EVERY DAY. This can be as simple as an hour walk, or 6 10 minute brisk walks, or an hour of light sports. Most experts agree that getting in at least 10,000 steps per day has an amazing health benefit, and will also assist in fat loss on the long run. Go look up your favorite body builder. The great majority spend the first hour of their sessions walking on a treadmill.
What if you don't have a smart watch? 10,000 steps for most people is just around 5 miles. If you cannot do this all at once, split it up throughout the day:
Here is my typical day of eating:
(below is my typical week of training)
Options:
That's all there is to it, folks. Being fit and healthy certainly does not mean starving or restriction. Hang out with me for a day and you will see just how much food I can destroy! The fact remains that as long as at least 80% of your diet comes from good foods, then you really can do whatever the hell you want with the other 20%. As you become fitter and leaner, you will learn how to do all this naturally, without having to count. Even better, you'll be so fit that you'll have to introduce some "junk" food, just to be able to fuel your body for those long days. Example: Super skinny backpackers who live on absolute crap for months, but it doesn't show one bit. So do you want to keep counting every calorie, starving yourself everyday, and dying to eat just one piece of chocolate everyday? Or do you want to train, be active, eat like a maniac, and still have room to enjoy some of your favorite treats every now and then?
Randall, Grunt Proof
SOURCES
BMR Calculator (http://www.bmi-calculator.net/bmr-calculator/)
Nancy Clark's Sports Nutrition Guidebook (http://www.nancyclarkrd.com/books/sportsnutrition.asp)
Mark Rippetoe's Starting Strength
Insulin Index of Foods (clinical study) (http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/66/5/1264.full.pdf+html)
Tortora & Derrickson's "Introduction to the Human Body..." 9th edition (http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Human-Body-Gerard-Tortora/dp/1118129199)
Sport Medicine on "Post-Workout Nutrition." (http://sportsmedicine.about.com/cs/nutrition/a/aa081403.htm)
Clinical trials on high fat diets and health risks (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19828712)
Clinical trial on high cholesterol and health risks (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16549459)
Clinical trials: Cholesterol and Atherosclerosis (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14623804)
Clinical trials on low-carb diets and obesity (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12761365)
The science behind caloric measurements and inaccuracies (http://www.livescience.com/26799-calorie-counts-inaccurate.html)
Dietary fats http://www.medic8.com/healthguide/articles/fats.html
Click on the image for the video Interestingly enough, the most common question I receive when discussing Grunt things is "what ab...